One benefits package rarely works equally well for all four generations
Financial pressure looks different at 24 than it does at 44 or 58. Employers who understand this design more effective support, see higher engagement with their benefits, and retain staff across age groups more successfully.
Generation Z (born 1997 to 2012) — uncertainty and immediacy
Gen Z employees entered the workforce during or after the pandemic, into a housing market they largely cannot access and an economy defined by cost-of-living pressure. Their primary financial concerns are immediate: rent or mortgage deposits, student debt, the cost of day-to-day living, and the apparent impossibility of the kind of financial milestones their parents achieved.
Pension contributions are often perceived as abstract and distant. The most effective benefits for this group tend to be visible, immediate and educational — budgeting tools, access to guidance, support with understanding what their employment benefits actually mean in practice. Early engagement with pensions, framed around flexibility rather than deferred reward, also tends to resonate.
Millennials (born 1981 to 1996) — squeezed in the middle
Millennial employees are often carrying the largest financial burden of any generation in the current workforce. Many are managing mortgages or high rental costs, childcare, ageing parent responsibilities, and the early to mid stages of building pension wealth — simultaneously. They are at the peak of financial complexity and often have the least time to manage it.
Financial planning access and pension clarity are highly valued by this group, as is protection — income protection and life cover. They are also the most likely generation to have variable or self-employed income alongside employed work, which adds further complexity.
Generation X (born 1965 to 1980) — retirement in focus
Gen X employees are typically 10 to 20 years from retirement and increasingly aware of whether they are on track. Many entered the workforce before auto-enrolment and have a patchwork of pension pots from multiple employers. The 2027 pension inheritance tax changes add a layer of complexity that most have not yet engaged with.
This group benefits significantly from access to a regulated financial planner — someone who can consolidate their pension position, run cashflow modelling, and help them understand what the next decade or two looks like in practical terms. Employer-sponsored access to advice is highly valued here, particularly where the employer covers or subsidises the initial engagement.
Baby Boomers (born 1946 to 1964) — transition and legacy
Where Baby Boomer employees remain in the workforce, their financial concerns are largely transitional: moving from accumulation to decumulation, understanding pension options at and beyond age 75, the impact of the 2027 inheritance tax changes on their estate, and how to transfer wealth to the next generation efficiently.
Engaging this group requires a different conversation to the others — one that is less about building financial resilience and more about making sense of what they have already built. Access to specialist pension and estate planning advice is the most valued benefit for this cohort.
What this means for benefits design
A single, undifferentiated benefits package communicates to each generation that their specific situation has not been considered. The most effective employer approach is a tiered or modular structure — a core that serves everyone, with specialist access that each generation can engage with as relevant.
The Aetas Workplace Performance Audit maps the generational composition of your workforce and identifies where the pressure is concentrated before any programme is designed. Nothing is introduced without first understanding what your organisation specifically needs.
Common questions
Which generation experiences the most financial stress?
CIPD research shows that financial stress is highest among Millennials and younger Gen X employees — those aged roughly 30 to 45 — who are managing the largest simultaneous financial burdens. However, the type of stress differs significantly by age, which is why a single support approach rarely addresses all of it effectively.
Should employers offer different benefits to different age groups?
The most effective approach is a core benefits package that works for everyone, alongside modular specialist access that each generation can engage with as relevant. This might mean financial education sessions for younger employees, pension consolidation support for mid-career staff, and regulated financial planning access for those approaching retirement.
How does the 2027 pension inheritance tax change affect different generations?
The change primarily affects Gen X and Baby Boomer employees who have accumulated significant pension wealth and may have planned around the current IHT-exempt status of pensions. For younger employees, the change is less immediately relevant but affects the long-term planning assumptions that underpin early pension saving decisions.
Can an employer offer regulated financial advice as a benefit?
Yes. Through Aetas Wealth, employees can access an FCA-regulated Independent Financial Adviser as a workplace benefit, at no cost to them and with the employer meeting or subsidising the cost. This is a significant differentiator from generic EAP or benefits platform provision, and particularly valued by Gen X and Baby Boomer employees.
Research on generational differences in financial wellbeing and workforce engagement is published by the CIPD. Guidance on auto-enrolment and employer pension duties is available at gov.uk. The 2027 pension inheritance tax changes are set out in the Finance Act 2026.
Understand how generational differences affect your workforce
The Workplace Performance Audit maps where financial pressure sits in your specific organisation before anything is proposed.
Book a Workplace Performance Audit